Posted On: December 31, 2007

Immigration 2007 – A Common Sense Year’s End Editorial in the WSJ

The December 31, 2007 edition of the Wall Street Journal contains a good year end editorial reminding us all of the value that immigrants provide to the United States.

Citing a recent paper published by the Immigration Policy Center, the WSJ notes that in U.S. cities with the largest populations and in border cities such as San Diego and El Paso, violent crime and property crime rates have gone down and an immigrant is 5 times less likely to be in prison than someone born in the U.S. So much for the argument that immigrants drive crime rates up.

Since 1996, according to the study, the national welfare caseload has declined by 60% (in some states by 90%). What else is down? Overall poverty, child poverty, child hunger. So much for the anti-immigrant insistence that immigrants drive up welfare costs.

The unemployment rate remains at only 4.7% and job growth continues. So much for the argument that immigrants take jobs away from Americans.

The editorial correctly concludes that clearly there is a cost to illegal immigration and it’s a bigger problem in some areas of the country than other areas. That’s why we need to allow those who are here to work legally and earn citizenship while at the same time securing our borders in a way that is smart, appropriate and compassionate.

Our country’s 2008 New Year’s resolution should be to come together and pass comprehensive immigration reform! Happy New Year!

Posted On: December 29, 2007

Your I-94 and How to Prove Timely Departure

It is often required when filing for adjustment of status or when applying for admission to the United States that the applicant prove that he or she did not overstay a prior period of authorized stay in the United States.

Theoretically, that should be easy. When the person previously left the U.S. by air or sea, they would have turned in their I-94 and the fact of their timely departure would have been recorded in the DHS database. The I-94 is also known as an Arrival/Departure Record and upon entry into the United States, it's endorsed with one's date and place of arrival, one's status (for example, F or H or L) and the end date of one's authorized stay (usually a specific date but sometimes marked as d/s - duration of status for certain visa holders such as F student visa holders).

But often, when the alien departs the United States, his or her I-94 is mistakenly not collected and so the departure is not included in the DHS database or the I-94 is collected but the data is incorrectly entered into the database. And, if the person left the U.S. by a land port, the I-94 would not be collected at all. This is a problem if at a later date, the alien needs to prove that they departed the U.S. when they were supposed to.

Remember that the burden of proving timely departure is on the traveler—not the U.S. government. Here’s what U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) says:

"You must provide U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) sufficient information so we can record your timely departure from the United States. This will close out your earlier record of arrival to this country. If you do not validate a timely departure from the United States, or, if you cannot reasonably prove otherwise when you apply for admission to the U.S. in the future, CBP may conclude you remained in the U.S. beyond your authorized stay. If this happens, the next time you apply to enter the U.S. your visa may be subject to cancellation or you may be returned immediately to your foreign point of origin."

So what should a person do to make sure that the U.S. has a record of the fact that they obeyed the law and departed the U.S. when they were supposed to? The American Immigration Lawyers Association has just issued a practice tip on this issue and here is what is recommended:

If your I-94 was not surrendered upon departure, then return it to the CBP. Send the card to: ACS – CBP SBU, 1084 South Laurel Rd., London, Kentucky 40744. Do not return it to a consulate, embassy or even a local CBP office.

But even doing this may not be enough. When you send in your I-94, send other documents to prove the actual day of departure. For example, send in a used airline ticket or boarding pass, a copy of a passport stamp showing date of arrival in home country, a pay slip from employment outside of U.S. after you departed, a credit card slip showing purchases made outside of the U.S. after departure, a school attendance record, etc.

When you send all of this in, include a written request on boldly colored paper asking that your date of departure be entered in the database—not the date your I-94 is received by the processing center.

When you next reenter the U.S., bring copies of all this with you just in case there is still a question about your prior departure. Even after you send your I-94 and other documents, the information might still not be entered or it still could be entered incorrectly and so having copies of what you sent should help.

Finally, if you want to find out if your I-94 was, in fact, received and the data entered, you can send in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request and ask for verification of the recorded date of departure and a copy of the returned I-94 (of course, keep a copy yourself before sending it in). Send the request to CBP’s FOIA office at the following address: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Attn: Mint Annex Building, FOIA Division, Washington, D.C. 20229.

The CBP advises that you should wait about 2 months after sending in the I-94 to ask for verification through FOIA.

Posted On: December 26, 2007

New I-9 Form - Required as of Today December 26

Just a reminder that as of today, December 26, 2007, the new I-9 form must be used by employers. As I noted in my posting of November 26, 2007, up until today, use of the new I-9 form was encouraged but not required. Now, it's required.

The new I-9 form removes five documents for List A—that is, the list of documents that simultaneously prove both identity and employment eligibility. They include: Certificate of U.S. Citizenship (Form N-560 or N-570); Certificate of Naturalization (Form N-550 or N-570); Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-151); the unexpired Reentry Permit (Form I-327); and the unexpired Refugee Travel Document (Form I-571). According to the USCIS, there forms lacked features to help deter counterfeiting and fraud.

Also, one document has been added to List A of the List of Acceptable Documents: the most recent version of the Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766).

Posted On: December 23, 2007

Citizenship: Oral Declarations Will No Longer Be Sufficient at U.S. Border

As most know, United States citizens as well as Canadian and Bermudian citizens who are entering the United States by land or sea ports-of-entry are required to establish their identity and citizenship to the satisfaction of a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Officer. Most do so by providing some documentary such as a passport or a birth certificate. However, it has also been possible for some to be admitted into the U.S. simply by orally declaring their citizenship.

No more. On December 21, 2007, the CBP amended its field guidance procedures to instruct its officers that citizenship may no longer ordinarily be established based on someone’s say so.

According to the Notice which is effective January 31, 2008, all travelers will be expected to present documents proving citizenship, such as a birth certificate, and government-issued
documents proving identity, such as a driver's license, when entering the United States through land and sea ports of entry.

Posted On: December 17, 2007

Philadelphia Passport Agency Advises to Apply for Passport Now Before the Next Rush

The Philadelphia Passport Agency is reminding people to file their applications for passports soon when things at the Philadelphia office, for now, are slow. After the much-reported summer rush for passports that resulted in significant passport processing delays, the agency is reporting that “we’re quiet for now”, according to a report in the December 17, 2007 edition of the Philadelphia Inquirer.

However, another rush for passports is expected when, in January, 2008, United States citizens will need to present a government-issued photo id and proof of citizenship when re-entering the U.S.


Posted On: December 14, 2007

I-130 Application for Immediate Relative - New Jersey and Massachusetts Districts Courts Agree with 9th Circuit

On December 12, 2007, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, in Taing v. Chertoff, joined the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in its decision, Freeman v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2006) and the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in its unpublished decision, Robinson v. Chertoff, 2007 WL 1412284 (D.N.J., May 14, 2007) in ruling that a properly filed I-130 Immediate Relative Petition does not automatically lapse if the petitioning U.S. citizen spouse dies while the application is pending. Recall that the I-130 is the application that is filed by either a U.S. citizen or U.S. permanent resident for certain “immediate relatives” including, of course, a spouse.

It has been the USCIS position that where a U.S. citizen files an I-130 for a spouse and then dies while that I-130 is pending, the I-130 must then be denied—basically because if the deceased U.S. citizen spouse dies before the I-130 is decided, then he or she is no longer the immediate relative of the non-citizen spouse.

As I posted back in November 12, 2007, the USCIS has instructed its adjudicators to continue to deny any I-130 application--outside the 9th Circuit--where the U.S. citizen spouse dies during the pendency of the I-130 application. Basically, the USCIS is instructing its adjudicators to ignore Freeman everywhere outside the 9th Circuit. Now, in light of the Massachusetts and New Jersey decisions, the USCIS may need to re-think its memorandum.

The Massachusetts and the New Jersey court decisions have both agreed with the 9th Circuit's reasoning in Freeman.

In both cases, the courts ruled that the death of the U.S. citizen spouse did not end the legal relationship between that U.S. citizen spouse and alien spouse—they are still immediate relatives, even after the death of the U.S. citizen, and the surviving spouse still has standing to pursue an adjustment of status application at the approval of the I-130.

The Courts' rulings in Massachusetts and New Jersey make complete legal and common sense, as did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Freeman.

We’ll see how the USCIS responds now that two U.S. District Courts have agreed with reasoning of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals—reasoning that the USCIS has instructed its adjudicators to ignore.

Posted On: December 13, 2007

Green Cards ( Form I-551 ) Without Expiration Dates Are Still Valid, At Least for Now

On December 11, 2007 the USCIS issued a Statement confirming that green cards without expiration dates are still completely valid despite apparent rumors to the contrary. A green card is more technically a Form I-551. Here's the USCIS Statement.

As I discussed in an earlier posting back in August of this year, the USCIS announced that it will eventually require that anyone who holds a green card without an expiration date obtain a new green card, via the filing of Form I-90. However, the USCIS hasn’t published a final rule yet and until that happens, green cards without expiration dates are still valid.

I still recommend that anyone holding such a green card file the I-90 application now in order to avoid the inevitable delays that will occur when the USCIS publishes its final rule and then everyone files at once.

Posted On: December 12, 2007

EB-2 Visa Catagory for Indians Moves Back Two Years in Latest Visa Bulletin

The Visa Bulletin for January 2008 has been released and the EB-2 catagory (employment-based second preference) for nationals of India moved back a full two years to January 1, 2000!

The employment-based second preference refers to members of the professions holding an advanced degree or persons of exceptional ability.

The EB-3 catagory for Indians remained at May 1, 2001.

Posted On: December 11, 2007

Form I-129 PIMS Confirmation Update

The Department of State has provided AILA (the American Immigration Lawyers Association) with an update regarding the recently implemented Petition Information Management System, otherwise known as PIMS. The Department of State has reported to AILA that while there are some minor growing pains in implementing the new system, PIMS confirmation is not causing delays in the issuing of visas.

Under PIMS, Form I-129 applications, along with the employer support letters and the other supporting documentation that is filed to obtain, for example, an H1-B visa or an L visa, are scanned into a database here in the U.S. Consular posts abroad are then required to access that database when an individual appears at the consulate for their visa interview. Once the documents that the visa applicant presents at the visa interview are checked against the documents in the database, the visa can then be issued--assuming the documents match.

The Department of State is reporting that the system has already resulted in catching some forged or altered I-797 forms (the USCIS approval notice that is issued when the USCIS approves the I-129 petition).

Otherwise, according to the DOS, there have not been significant delays in consular posts being able to access the scanned documents and PIMS confirmation has not caused delays in applicants having their visas issued.

Posted On: December 11, 2007

DHS Now Taking Ten Fingerprints from Arriving International Visitors at Dulles International with 9 Other Airports Soon to Follow – Philadelphia International Not Yet Included

On December 10, 2007, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it is now collecting 10 fingerprints from international visitors arriving at Washington’s Dulles International Airport as an enhanced security measure.

This makes Dulles the first port of entry to perform the 10 fingerprint collection from international visitors.

The next ports scheduled to collect 10 fingerprints from international visitors are: Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport; Boston Logan International Airport; Chicago O'Hare International Airport; San Francisco International Airport; George Bush Houston Intercontinental Airport; Miami International Airport; Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport; Orlando International Airport; and New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport.

Philadelphia International will be among the 278 remaining ports will begin this process by the end of 2008.

Of course, the U.S. is not the only country taking such measures. In November, Japan began taking not only fingerprints but also photographs of all foreigners entering Japan. In Japan, all foreigners over the age of 16, including even permanent residents of Japan, must undergo this biometric processing (only ethnic Korean permanent residents of Japan and diplomats are exempt).

Posted On: December 8, 2007

Visa Fee, both Immigrant and Nonimmigrant, Will Be Increased January 2008

The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) is reporting that the Department of State is about to publish notice in the Federal Register of an increase of nonimmigrant visa fees to $131 from $100 and an increase of immigrant visa fees by $20.

The increase is apparently going to be effective January 1, 2008.

I will post the formal notice when it is available.

Posted On: December 7, 2007

New Passport “Mega-Center” to Open Next Spring to Meet Increased Demand for Passports

On December 6, 2007, the United States Department of State announced that it will be opening a second “passport Mega-Center” this coming spring in Tucson, Arizona. The other center is located and already operational in Hot Springs, Arkansas.

The two centers will each be able to print and mail out up to 10 million passports and travel documents, something that is intended to meet the expected increased demand for passports that will result from the new passport rules under the Western Hemisphere Initiative Act (WHTI). Since January 23, 2007, WHTI regulations have already required Americans to have passports or other approved documents to enter, re-enter or depart the United States by air.

On January 31, 2008, WHTI requirements will be applied to travel in and out of the United States by land and ferry. That is, U.S. and Canadian citizens will need to present either a WHTI-complaint document or government-issued photo ID, such as a driver’s license, plus proof of citizenship, such as a birth certificate.

Passport applications will continue to be processed and approved at the various Department of State passport agencies located throughout the U.S. The Philadelphia Passport Agency is located at U.S. Custom House, 200 Chestnut Street, Room 103, Philadelphia, PA 19106-2970. Its hours are 8:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m., local time, Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.

Posted On: December 5, 2007

DHS Files Appeal of No-Match Injunction Order

On December 5, 2007 Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff released a statement confirming that DHS has filed an appeal of U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer’s Order granting an injunction against the Department’s enforcement of its proposed regulation on Social Security No-Match letters. DHS, according to the statement, is not “abandoning” the regulation.

Here is my earlier post on Judge’ Breyer’s Order.

This move seems to be inconsistent with an earlier DHS request that the Court put the matter on hold while it re-worked the regulation to try to fix the provisions that Judge Breyer found objectionable. Here's my earlier post on that DHS request.

Not surprising, the DHS seems to be pushing hard to get this regulation in place in some form and it appears inevitable that private employers will, in fact, eventually be put in the position of having to deal with it.

The reg would set up procedures for employers to follow when they receive a no-match letters from the Social Security Administration advising the employer that an employee’s name does not match the social security number that the SSA has on file. Basically the employer would have to correct the discrepancy within 90 days or fire the employee. An employer who followed the procedure would have a “safe-harbor” against any allegation that it was knowingly employing an illegal worker; an employer who ignored the procedures would be presumed to be on notice that it was employing an illegal worker.

Posted On: December 4, 2007

H-1B, H-2 and H-3 Visa Cap Count Announced by USCIS as of December 4, 2007

As of December 4, 2007, the USCIS released the latest numbers on the various caps associated with H-1B visas, H-2B visas and H-3 visas.

It was no news to most that the H-1B cap of 65,000 was reached on April 2, 2007 (also the very first day such petitions could be filed) and that the cap of an additional 20,000 H-1B visas for foreign workers with a Master’s or higher level degree from a U.S. academic institution was reached on April 30, 2007. Other than those eligible for H-1B visas because they will work for cap-exempt U.S. employers, cap-subject prospective H-1B employees will have to wait until the next fiscal year.

H-1B visas are available to certain highly skilled temporary workers who have a bachelor’s degree or higher (or its equivalent) in a specific specialty such as architects, engineers, computer programmers, accountants, doctors and college professors.

On the H-2 visas (for workers in industries with peak load, seasonal or other U.S. employers with intermittent employment needs) the annual cap is divided the annual numerical limitations of 66,000 into two halves. The first half annual cap of 33,000 such visas was reached on September 27, 2007. For the second half, 7,164 of the remaining 33,000 H-2 visas have been approved or are pending as of December 4, 2007.

Finally, on the general H-3 visas (visas for aliens who are coming temporarily to the U.S. to receive training provided by a business entity, academic, or vocational institute (other than graduate medical education or training) there is no annual cap. However, for the particular H-3 visa for “Special Exchange Visitors” (those who are participating in a special education training program for children with physical, mental, or emotional disabilities), there is an annual cap of only 50 visas and the USCIS announced that as of November 29, 2007, one such H-3 visa has been approved.

I intend to post a specific article on H-3 visas in the next day or two.


Posted On: December 3, 2007

New Philadelphia Fingerprinting/Biometrics Location

It appears that the location of the local Philadelphia USCIS fingerprinting/biometrics office (more formally the USCIS Philadelphia Application Support Center) is moving from its present location at 120 North 8th Street in Center City Philadelphia to 10300 Drummond Road in Philadelphia. A quick Mapquest search shows that the new location is basically opposite the Northeast Philadelphia Airport in between Grant Avenue and Woodhaven Road.

I have not seen a formal announcement about this; I just know that new fingerprinting/biometrics notices are going out with the Drummond Road address being stated as the location.

When and if something more formal is announced, I'll post it.