June 22, 2009

I-140 Premium Processing is Back for Many I-140 Applications

The USCIS announced on June 22, 2009 that effective June 29, 2009, it is going to resume Premium Processing Service for most Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker.

The USCIS will accept Premium Processing requests for Form I-140 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker involving EB-1 Aliens with Extraordinary Ability, EB-1 Outstanding Professors and Researchers, EB-2 Members of Professions with Advanced Degrees or Exceptional Ability not seeking a National Interest Waiver, EB-3 Professionals, EB-3 Skilled Workers, and EB-3 Workers other than Skilled Workers and Professionals.

It will still NOT accept premium processing requests for Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, that involve EB-1 Multinational Executives and Managers and EB-2 Members of Professions with Advanced Degrees or Exceptional Ability seeking a National Interest Waiver.

This is very welcome news.

With premium processing service, the USCIS guarantees that for the $1,000 processing fee (in addition to the usual application fees), it will decide an application within 15 calendar days. If it doesn’t meet that deadline, the USCIS refunds the $1,000 fee but still continues to process the request as part of the Premium Processing Service.

I have never had a premium processed application not decided within the 15 days so the program definitely works.

February 1, 2009

New I-9 Employment Eligibility Rule is Delayed

On January 30, 2009, the USCIS announced that it was delaying by 60 days (until April 3, 2009) implementation of the rule change that will make changes to the list of documents that are acceptable to verify employment eligibility.

The new rule is intended to streamline the Form I-9 process. All employers must complete a Form I-9 for all newly hired employees to verify their identity and authorization to work in the United States.

The new rule will amend USCIS regulations that govern what types of acceptable identity and employment authorization documents employees may present to their employers for completion of the Form I-9.

Under the new rule, employers will no longer be able to accept expired documents to verify employment authorization on the Form I-9.

October 15, 2008

TN Visas Can Now be Obtained and Renewed for Three Years

On October 14, 2008, the USCIS announced that TN visas can now be initially granted and then renewed for up to a maximum of 3 years rather than just 1 year as per the prior rule.

TN visas are granted to certain professional workers from Canada and Mexico who have at least a bachelor’s degree or appropriate professional credentials and who work in certain qualified fields pursuant to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

The extension form 1 to 3 years will really make it easier on both the employees and the employers who utilize TN visas. Now, they will not have to incur the costs and hassle of having to renew annually. The change is also effective for spouses and unmarried minor children of a TN nonimmigrant.

Here is the FAQs that was released by the USCIS yesterday. However, the FAQs is confusing in that it still refers to extensions as being available for only one year rather than three years--see, "How many times can a person apply for TN visas?" The USCIS announcement clearly states that the 3 year period applies not only to intial applications for the TN visa but also to renewal applications.

September 23, 2008

Non-Minister Special Immigrant Religious Worker Program Expiring October 1, 2008 Unless the Senate Acts

The USCIS issued a reminder that unless the U.S. Senate acts soon, then authorization for the non-minister special immigrant religious worker program will expire on Oct. 1, 2008. Anyone wishing to apply to serve in the two non-minister categories of the program must either adjust status to permanent residence or apply for, and be admitted with, an immigrant visa before Oct. 1, 2008. The expiration date also applies to the accompanying spouses and children of these workers

The two expiring categories are special immigrant religious workers in professional or non-professional capacities within a religious vocation or occupation. The expiration date does not apply to special immigrant religious workers entering the United States solely to carry on the vocation of a minister of a religious denomination.

The U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation on April 14, 2008, extending the expiration date and the Senate is currently considering similar legislation but has not yet passed it. The USCIS announced that if Congress does not extend the expiration date, it will, beginning October 1, 2008, hold any pending Form I-360 and Form I-485 affected by the expiration date in abeyance until further notice. However, unless Congress extends the expiration date, USCIS will begin rejecting Form I-360 petitions and Form I-485 applications filed on or after Oct. 1, 2008, which are based on the expired provisions.


August 9, 2008

U.S. Passport Card Now an Accepted List A I-9 Document

The U.S.C.I.S. announced on August 8th that the new U.S. Passport Card may be used as a List A document in the employment eligibility verification I-9 process. As a List A document, the new Passport card is valid for I-9 purposes for both identity and work authorization.

For travel purposes, the Passport Card provides a cheaper alternative to the traditional U.S. passport book and expedites document processing at United States land and sea ports-of-entry under certain limited situations: for U.S. citizens traveling to Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean, and Bermuda (it can’t be used for international air travel).

With this new announcement, U.S. employers can now accept the card as List A, I-9 document.

July 1, 2008

Successful Writ of Mandamus

I am pleased to report that a Writ of Mandamus that I filed on behalf of a client in the U.S. District Court for New Jersey resulted in very prompt approval of the client’s I-485 Adjustment of Status application—even before the government filed an Answer to the Writ.

The original I-485 was filed on February 27, 2007 by the minor child of a parent whose own employment based I-485 was filed on the same date.

The parent’s I-140 Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker and the parent’s I-485 application for adjustment of status were approved on October 27, 2007 but, for some unexplained reason, the minor daughter’s application was not decided at the same time. I waited for the daughter’s approval which should have routinely followed the mother’s approval---but nothing. After about 3 months of delay, I contacted the Texas Service Center by phone and mail and I was told I should expect a decision within 60 days.

60 days later, I contacted the TSC again and I was told again that I would have to wait another 60 days. When that second 60 day period ran, I advised the client to simply proceed with the Writ of Mandamus.

Actually, the waiting periods in this case were not as bad as some others. What bothered me about the delay was that there really could not have been any possible reason for the delay. There was nothing controversial about the minor’s daughter’s derivative application whatsoever—once the parent’s applications were approved, the daughter’s approval should have been routine.

I filed the Writ of Mandamus on May 28, 2008 and on June 22, 2008 I received a phone call from the U.S. Attorney who was assigned to the case that the daughter’s I-485 had just been approved!

This is not to say that Writs of Mandamus should be filed lightly or that they should be filed before there has been a truly unreasonable delay. But when there is an inexplicable, unreasonable delay and the facts justify filing the Writ, I recommend that client’s proceed with this extraordinary remedy.

June 18, 2008

J-1 Visa and the Exceptional Hardship Waiver - a Favorable AAO decision

A recent decision by the AAO shows how difficult, but not impossible, it is to satisfy the “exceptional hardship” requirement for obtaining a waiver of the requirement that a J-1 nonimmigrant exchange visitor return to her home country for 2 years before being eligible for an immigrant visa. Exceptional hardship in waiver cases is often very difficult to establish because “exceptional” means just that: exceptional. It’s something far beyond just the usual anxiety, loneliness and financial hardship that would be suffered by any loving family members who might be forced to separated from each other.

In this AAO case, the J-1 visa holder was required by regulation to return to her home county, the Philippines, because under the law, all J-1 exchange visitors who come to U.S. to receive graduate medical education must return home for two years before they can apply for permanent residency, unless certain waivers apply. In this case, the only waiver that was available was the “exceptional hardship” waiver. This required her to show that her departure “would impose exceptional hardship upon the alien’s [U.S. citizen or permanent resident] spouse or child”.

The AAO started its analysis by asking whether exceptional hardship would be suffered by the applicant’s spouse or child if the circumstances forced them to travel abroad with the applicant to the applicant’s home country. Just because they chose to stay in the U.S. while the applicant was required to return home, would not show “exceptional hardship”.

Even then, even if exceptional hardship abroad were shown, the AAO said that it still must be shown that the U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse or child would suffer “exceptional hardship” here in the U.S. if the applicant simply went home alone.

In this case, the applicant offered evidence of exceptional hardship to the California Service Center of the USCIS but her application was denied. Fortunately, the AAO ruled in her favor in her appeal.

It first held that her U.S. citizen children would suffer exceptional hardship if they went to the Philippines with their mother. One child has bronchial asthma which would have worsened in the Philippine environment, the children lived in the U.S their whole lives, did not speak Tagalog and would be subject to kidnappings as U.S. citizens. The applicant wisely submitted affidavits and much documentary evidence about conditions in the Philippines.

The AAO was also satisfied . . . . .

Continue reading "J-1 Visa and the Exceptional Hardship Waiver - a Favorable AAO decision" »

June 11, 2008

I-140 Premium Processing Applications Will Soon Be Accepted for Certain H-1B Workers

On June 11, 2008, the USCIS announced that starting June 16, 2008, it will accept I-907 Premium Processing requests for I-140 applications (Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker) that are filed on behalf of alien workers who are near the end of their sixth year in H-1B nonimmigrant status.

Requests for premium processing will be accepted for I-140 petitions that are filed on behalf of those who are 1) currently in an H-1B nonimmigrant status; 2) whose sixth year in H-1B status will end within 60 days; 3) who are only eligible for a further extension of H-1B nonimmigrant status under section 104(c) of AC21* and 4) who are ineligible to extend their H-1B status under section 106(a) of AC21**.

*Section 104(c) of AC21 permits someone in H-1B status to extend their stay in increments of up to three years if they are the beneficiary of an approved Form I-140 and if an immigrant visa is not immediately available.

**Section 106(a) of AC21 permits someone in H-1B status to extend their stay in increments of up to one year, provided the Form I-140 petition or underlying labor certification has been pending for at least 365 days.

This change will really help those who otherwise would not be able to maintain status while waiting for normal processing times for their I-140 and where because an immigrant visa is not immediately available, they would not be able to file their I-485 application to adjust to permanent residency status when their I-140 is filed.

With premium processing, the USCIS will make a decision on the I-140 within 15 calendar-days from the time of filing the I-907 request for such premium processing.


June 10, 2008

EAD Validity Period for Those with Pending Adjustment of Status Applications to Double from One Year to Two Years

On June 9, 2008, DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff announced that EAD authorization periods for those with pending adjustment of status applications will soon be granted for two year periods rather than the current one year period. He announced the change in a “State of Immigration” address he gave with Commerce Secretary Gutierrez in Washington.

The change is a very welcome one. By doubling the validity period for work authorization, it will mean less expense (the filing fee for the I-765 alone is $340.00) and hassle for those with pending adjustment applications. The change is supposed to start later this month.

Here is the quote from Secretary Chertoff’s remarks:

“. . . I'm also pleased to announce that we will be extending the validity period of the employment authorization documents that we issue to individuals who are waiting adjustment of status to lawful permit residency or in colloquial phrase, the green card.

Currently, adjustment applications are granted employment authorization documents with only a one year maximum validity. Beginning later this month, we'll start issuing these documents with a two-year validity period for aliens who are waiting adjustment of status if their application is expected to be pending for more than a year.

This, again, is eliminating a persistent source of frustration for workers who are here, who have a pending adjustment application but have to go and renew their employment documents every single year. It's going to cut the paperwork there. . .”

June 2, 2008

All Fragomen Permanent Labor Certifications to be Audited

On June 2, 2008, the Department of Labor announced that it is now auditing all permanent labor certification applications filed by attorneys at Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy. DOL says that it is doing so because of information it says it received that in at least some cases the Fragomen firm improperly instructed clients who filed permanent labor certification applications to contact their attorney before hiring U.S. workers who allegedly were qualified.

During this auditing process, DOL will decide which, if any, applications should be denied or placed into department-supervised recruitment.

The permanent labor certification process allows employers to sponsor aliens for permanent residency but only where it been established through a strict, detailed recruitment process that there is no qualified, willing and available U.S. worker to fill the position. The employer’s attorney is not supposed to be involved in the recruitment process (unless he or she is typically involved in the employer’s hiring).

June 1, 2008

OPT Extension Lawsuit Filed in New Jersey Federal Court

On May 31, 2008, opponents of the DHS decision to extend Optional Practical Training (OPT) to 29 months (under certain limited circumstances) have challenged that decision in U.S. District Court in Newark, New Jersey. The lawsuit was filed by the so-called Immigration Reform Law Institute and it was joined by the Programmers Guild and some other groups such as the American Engineering Association and Brightfuturejobs.com.

It’s questionable whether these parties even have standing to bring the lawsuit. Assuming that they have standing, it’s clear that the suit has no merit whatsoever.

DHS, which announced the new rule on April 4, 2008, wisely extended the period of OPT from 12 to 29 months for certain qualified F-1 non-immigrant students who have a degree in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) and who are employed by businesses enrolled in the E-Verify program.

The whole purpose of the rule change is to do what’s necessary to attract and retain highly skilled foreign workers that will help U.S. companies stay competitive in today’s world economy. If the U.S. doesn't welcome these highly skilled workers, other countries certainly will.

The new rule also addressed the situation where an F-1 student’s status and work authorization expires before he or she can begin employment under the H-1B visa program by automatically extending the period of stay and work authorization for all F-1 students with pending H-1B petitions. Finally, the new rule will also allow students to apply for OPT within 60 days of graduation.

I’ll post updates on the progress of the suit which I am confident will ultimately be dismissed.

May 14, 2008

Visa Bulletin June 2008

Here is the June, 2008 Visa Bulletin. I would only point out that Section D notes expected retrogression in the Family 2A category for Mexico and that Section E notes that the Employment Third preference (EB3) category is close to the annual numerical limit.

May 13, 2008

Orozco v. Mukasey – Does Fraudulent Entry Make One Ineligible for Adjustment of Status?

On March 25, 2008, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that a non-citizen who enters the U.S. by fraudulent means is statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status because that non-citizen has not been “admitted.” The case is Orozco v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 1068(9th Cir. 2008). In this case, the non-citizen entered the U.S. through a checkpoint where he was inspected but he did so with someone else’s green card. He then married a U.S. citizen who filed an I-130 on his behalf and the I-130 was approved. Sometime thereafter he was put in removal proceedings where he tried to adjust his status to permanent residency because of his marriage and the approved I-130 and he asked for a 212(i) fraud waiver.

The Immigration Judge denied Orozco’s application for adjustment on the grounds that to adjust status, one must have been lawfully “admitted” to the U.S. and because of his fraudulent entry, Orozco was not “lawfully admitted”. The IJ held that the law defines "admission" as the "lawful entry of the alien into the U.S. after inspection and authorization".

The IJ ruled that the 212(i) fraud waiver, even if granted, wouldn’t change the lack of “admission”. The BIA affirmed and the federal court then upheld the IJ and the BIA.

The court’s ruling is binding law in the 9th Circuit only and, in fact, a federal court in the 2nd Circuit ruled completely differently (Emokah v. Mukasey).

On May 12, 2008, the 9th Circuit stayed its ruling for 60 days to allow the parties to file for rehearing so this ruling may not be the last word in the Circuit. Certainly if the case does hold up, one issue for future cases will be whether Orozco controls only where the non-citizen affirmatively enters the U.S. in a fraudulent manner--that is, knowing full well that his documents are counterfeit, as opposed to someone who presents himself at a point of entry with a fraudulent document but is waived through without actually showing it.

I’ll up the post when there is a decision on any re-hearing.

May 8, 2008

TN Visa – The USCIS Announces Proposed Rule to Extend Stays to 3 Years

The USCIS has published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that, if enacted, would increase the maximum amount of time a TN visa holder can remain in the United States before needing to renew his or her stay from one year to three years. The TN visa is a nonimmigrant visa that is available under NAFTA and it’s available to Canadian and Mexican citizens who have a minimum of a bachelor’s degree or who have appropriate professional credentials, who work in certain professions that are listed in the NAFTA regs (Appendix 1603.D.1 to Annex 1603)

Under the proposed rule, the TN visa holder would also be able to apply for extensions of stay in 3 year increments rather than the present one year increment.

The current rule that TN visa extensions can be granted indefinitely would remain the same.

This change would be a welcome, common sense change to the TN visa program. The three year stay would put the TN visa holder on par with H1B professionals who can be granted stays in 3 year increments (although H1B visa holders are generally limited to a maximum of 6 years in H1B status).

The rule change will make it administratively much easier for both U.S. employers and the TN visa holders, not to mention cheaper, too.

Here is the actual proposed rule. The USCIS will accept comments for 30 days before taking further action.

May 2, 2008

Bill to Eliminate Per-Country Employment-Based Caps is Introduced in Congress

On April 29, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) introduced a bill (that has been co-sponsored by Bob Goodlatte (R-VA)), that would eliminate the arbitrary per-country caps for employment-based immigrants.

Currently, the number of employment-based immigrants that can come from any one country per year is capped at 7% and because of this, certain Chinese or Indian employment-based immigrant applicants face up to a decade or longer for a green card. So a top post-graduate at the top of his or her class at a school such as Johns Hopkins or MIT, for example, can sometimes wait much longer than a student from a less-populated country.

The cap is completely arbitrary and makes no sense at all.

The bill is a good example of a lawmaker offering a common sense solution to a problem that presently restricts the opportunity for U.S. employers to employ the talent they want to employ based on just that—talent alone and not country of origin.

I’ll post updates on the bill.

April 28, 2008

The Cost of Enforcement Only Immigration Reform - A New Study by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce

According to a study published in Business Week’s on-line April 25, 2008 edition, the Administration’s effort to get tough on immigration enforcement (perhaps in an effort to get everyone back to the table to agree on comprehensive immigration reform) (see my posting of April 22, 2008 here) will cost U.S. employers more than $1 billion a year and U.S. workers $billions in lost wages. These numbers are not from some left-wing think tank—they are from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

According to the study, the Administration’s proposed "no match" rule (which will effectively require employers to fire workers when a social security number mis-match cannot be resolved in time) will impose a heavy cost on employers.

By the Department of Homeland Security’s own admission, two percent of legal workers a year will lose their jobs because they can't resolve the mismatch. Translated, that means between 37,000 to 137,000 legal workers will be unable to get work and lost wages will be from $8 billion to $37 billion.

Hopefully studies like this in combination with the constant news of ICE workplace raids will get all sides to agree that somehow, either before or soon after the presidential election, work on comprehensive immigration reform has to be a priority.

April 27, 2008

H-1B Petitions for Which a State License is Required for Employment - - the USCIS Provides Guidance in Catch-22 Situations

I recently obtained H-1B approval (not a FY 2009 cap case) for a therapist who required licensing in the State of New Jersey but who could not obtain that licensing until after the H-1B petition was approved.

Matters like this can present a classic Catch-22 situation: on the one hand, the H-1B Beneficiary cannot obtain the required license that is necessary to practice his or her profession from a State but they can’t get that license without first obtaining H-1B approval; on the other hand, the USCIS may not approve the H-1B petition without proof that the Beneficiary has obtained the required license.

A recent Memorandum by the USCIS provides common sense guidance to adjudicators in deciding such cases. The Adjudicators Field Manual (Chapter 31) has now been updated to allow for a temporary, one-year USCIS approval of the H-1B petition (assuming all other requirements have been met) that then allows the State (or other licensing authority) to issue the license.

In order for the USCIS to approve the H-1B petition for this one year period, the Beneficiary must prove that he or she has filed an application for the required license and that they are fully qualified to receive the license (that is, that the H-1B beneficiary has met all the educational, training, experience and any other requirements required for the license).

It is incumbent upon the employer and Beneficiary to file a timely request to extend the H-1B status during this one year time period with proof that the Beneficiary has, by then, obtained the license.

The USCIS makes it very clear in the Memorandum that this one year approval does NOT imply that it is authorizing the Beneficiary to actually work at the job that requires the license—the State must issue the license first.

Here is a copy of the USCIS Memorandum.

April 25, 2008

New I-765 Work Authorization Application – Deadline for Using Old Edition is Announced

On April 24, 2008, the USCIS announced that it is modifying Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, to include additional eligibility codes so that the application is consistent with the DHS new rule for extending OPT status for certain qualified F-1 students. A deadline for using the old edition has been announced. Here is the announcement.

For all I-765 applicants, the USCIS will accept the July 30, 2007 edition of the form only through July 8, 2008.

Starting July 9, 2008, however, the USCIS will only accept the new, revised Form I-765 which has an edition date of April 8, 2008.

Here is my prior entry providing the detail on the new eligibility codes.

April 22, 2008

ICE Workplace Raids Continue; Will Comprehensive Immigration Reform be Put Back on the Table

In its April 21, 2008 edition, the Houston Chronicle reports on what many businesses are already learning the hard way – that ICE workplace enforcement of immigrant law is way up and still increasing. ICE raided the Shipley Do-Nuts warehouse complex in Houston last week as a part of a very concerted effort at what is calls “interior enforcement” of the law.

The raid followed another high profile ICE raid of a chain of Mexican restaurants in New York, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio in which the owner of the restaurant chain and nine of his managers were arrested on criminal charges.

The raids appear to be part of an effort by the Administration to get comprehensive immigration reform back on Congress’ agenda. The Administration’s thinking may be that if the raids make life so untenable for everyone - - the undocumented workers, the business community, local politicians who feel enforcement has been hoisted on them - - then maybe everyone will come back to the table and talk about real and comprehensive reform. Company owners, managers (including middle managers) and supervisors, human resources managers, union business agents are all being targeted; they are hardly immune from prosecution. Worksite criminal arrests by ICE increased to 863 in 2007 from 176 in fiscal year 2005 which is an increase of 490 percent.

We’ll see. But in the meantime, employers and undocumented employees have to understand that the USCIS is serious about enforcing immigration laws related to hiring undocumented workers and the penalties are harsh.

April 22, 2008

H-1B Receipt Notices So Far

I was pleased today that I received the last of the receipt notices for all of the premium processed H-1B applications that I filed on April 1.

The last receipt notice was emailed to me today by the Vermont Service Center followed later tonight by an emailed approval notice on the same matter.

I have not received receipt notices on non-premiumed processed H-1Bs yet.

April 19, 2008

F-1 Students Will be Allowed to Request Change of Status with Certain H-1B Petitions

On April 18, 2008, the USCIS announced that it would allow F-1 students who are the beneficiaries of selected H-1B petitions for fiscal year 2009 to request a change of status in lieu of consular processing.

This rule change will greatly benefit students who otherwise would have a gap between the end of their F-1 student status and the start date for their H-1B status. The April 18th announcement is a follow-up to an interim final rule that was announced by the USCIS on April 8th that automatically extended the F-1 status of students who are the beneficiaries of approved H-1B petitions so that this gap can be covered.

F-1 Students will get the automatic extension if they are the beneficiary of an H-1B petition filed for the 2009 fiscal year and if they already requested a change of status as part of their H-1B application.

Students should be aware however that if the USCIS ultimately rejects or denies the H-1B petition, the automatic extension will also terminate at the same time.

If you, understandably, thought that you did not qualify for an extension when your H-1B petition was filed and thought that you needed to depart the U.S. and consular process for your H-1B visa, you can now request a change of status. Your request has to be received within 30 days of the issuance of the receipt notice.

To request a change of status in lieu of consular notification, you (or your lawyer) need to send an e-mail with the change of status request to the USCIS Service Center where your petition is pending. You have to do this within 30 days after you get the H-1B receipt notice. There are specific USCIS email addresses for each service center for just this purpose.

Your request has to include the I-129 Petition receipt number, the petitioner’s and beneficiary’s name, the beneficiary’s date of birth, the I-94 number, and the SEVIS number. Here are the email addresses:

For the Vermont Service Center:

For Premium Processing cases: VSCPPCAPGAP.Vscppcapgap@dhs.gov
For Non-Premium cases: VSCNONPPCAPGAP.Vscnonppcapgap@dhs.gov

For the California Service Center

For Premium Processing cases: CSC.ppcapgap@dhs.gov
For Non-Premium cases: CSC.nonppcapgap@dhs.gov

Please contact me if you have any questions or if you need any assistance in requesting the change of status.

April 14, 2008

H-1B Lottery is Held – 4/14/08

Today, April 14, 2008, the USCIS conducted its computer-generated random selection processes on H-1B petitions for fiscal year 2009. Those selected will now be adjudicated and if approved, will be eligible to receive an H-1B visa number. First, a random selection was done for the 20,000 “master’s or higher degree” exemption and then a second random selection was done on the remaining advance degree petitions together with the general H-1B pool of petitions, for the 65,000 cap.

If your petition was selected for full adjudication, you should receive a receipt notice dated no later than June 2, 2008. If your petition was not selected, the USCIS will return your petition packet and the fee.

Some H-1B petitions have been “wait-listed” and potentially could replace petitions chosen to receive an FY-2009 cap number, but for whatever reason are denied or withdrawn. If your petition has been wait-listed, you’ll get a letter from the USCIS informing you of that status.

April 12, 2008

Visa Bulletin for May 2008 Released by Department of State

The May 2008 Visa Bulletin is out. The only real progress to report since the April 2008 Visa Bulletin is in the EB-3 Worldwide and Philippines Priority Dates which jumped over one year from July 1, 2005 to March 1, 2006.

April 10, 2008

H-1B Application Cap is Reached USCIS Announces

The USCIS announced on April 10th that the preliminary count for H-1B applications is 163,000 of which 31,200 were for the advanced degree category.

The USCIS will likely conduct the computer generated selection process next week and it will begin by selectiing 20,000 petitions filed under the advanced degree exemption.

If an advanced degree petition is not selected in this initial lottery, it will then be included in the later lottery for the cap-subject 65,000 limit H-1B petitions.

I'll keep you updated.

April 9, 2008

I-765 Work Authorization and New OPT Categories – You Must Use the New Form (Revision Date April 8, 2008) after March 30, 2008

Just a reminder that the USCIS has revised the I-765 Work Authorization form (the revision date is April 8, 2008) and the new form, which is filed by foreign nationals to obtain an EAD (Employment Authorization Document) must be used as of March 31, 2008. The new, revised I-765 include a change that is relevant to F-1 students seeking OPT-based employment authorization and the change is a result of the recently announced Rule that provides for a 17 month extension for certain OPT students.

Here are the new USCIS instructions for the revised I-765.

The prior eligibility code (c)(3)(i) will no longer be used on the I-765. It has been replaced with the following three codes: (c)(3)(A) for pre-completion OPT; (c)(3)(B) for post-completion OPT; and (c)(3)(C) for a 17-month extension for an F-1 student who has received a degree in Science, Technology, Engineering, or Mathematics (STEM), that appears on the STEM designated Degree Program List published on the SEVP website.

If you are filing as a STEM student requesting the 17-month extension of your currently authorized optional practical training under (c)(3)(C), you must state on the new I-765 your degree, you must now include the employers name and E-Verify id number and you must submit a copy of your degree that must indicate your major field of study.

The new Form I-765 also eliminates the option of filing due to replacement of an EAD that was never received, and for re-issuance of an EAD that was issued with incorrect information due to a USCIS error. If you require a new EADs for either of these two specific reasons, you must contact the specific office that processed the initial EAD or call the National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283.


April 8, 2008

H-1B Cap is Reached - Including Advanced Degree Cap

On April 8, 2008 and to no one’s surprise, the USCIS announced that it has received enough H-1B petitions to meet the cap for fiscal year 2009.

USCIS also received more than 20,000 H-1B petitions filed on behalf of beneficiaries under the “advanced degree” exemption. Before it runs the random selection process, the USCIS will first complete initial data entry for all the filings it received but it has not announced the date on which it will conduct that random selection process.

It will conduct the selection process for “advanced degree” exemption petitions first and any “advanced degree” petition that is not selected will get another shot at approval by then being included in the random selection process for the 65,000 limit.

March 15, 2008

Vias Bulletin for April 2008 - Some Progress on Employment Based 2nd Preference Catagory for India Nationals

Here is the April, 2008 Visa Bulletin just released by the State Department.

The good news is that there was some progress in the employment-based 2nd preference catagory for Indian nationals which went from unavailable last month to being available this month for those with a priority date prior to December 1, 2003. Section D of the Bulletin discusses the forward movement in this particular catagory.

March 4, 2008

Unauthorized Employment – Executives and Managers are Being Indicted and Convicted. ICE is Not Fooling Around

In the space of about one week, word comes from ICE (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) that big sentences were handed down in Federal Court in Florida in the Rosenbaum-Cunningham International (RCI) immigration scam and that big indictments were returned against five current managers in a New York case involving Pallet Management Division of IFCO Systems North America.

Work place raids, in which unauthorized unskilled workers are arrested, detained and then placed in removal proceedings often make headlines. However, the RCI and IFCO matters should be reminders to business executives and managers that if they break immigration laws, they are going to get hammered.

In the RCI matter, the company’s former president, a former vice-president and the former controller (who all previously entered guilty pleas on harboring illegal aliens and conspiracy to defraud the U.S. charges) were sentenced on March 3 to 120 months, 51 months and 30 months respectively. All three were also held to be jointly and severally liable for evaded federal taxes and were each ordered to pay well over $15 million. They had all previously been ordered to turn over bank accounts, life insurance policies, etc.

Is there any advantage that an executive thinks his company might be getting by hiring unauthorized workers that is worth risking incarceration and penalties like that?

In the IFCO matter, the managers have been charged with Conspiracy to Harbor Illegal Aliens, to Encourage and Induce Illegal Aliens, and to Transport Illegal Aliens. The job titles of the defendants are Vice President for New Market Development, New Market Development Manager, Operations Manager for New Market Development and Human Resources Manager. The investigation began in February 2005, when an employee at an IFCO plant called ICE to report that Hispanic workers were ripping up W-2 forms; the employee asked a manager about it and he was told that they were doing it because they were illegal aliens, had fake social security cards and didn’t intend to file their taxes.

Arrests soon followed and nearly 1,200 workers at IFCO’s 40 nationwide plants were detained. Seven IFCO managers later pled guilty to felony and misdemeanor charges and they are awaiting sentencing.

The newly announced charges carry a ten-year maximum term of imprisonment (although the maximum on the aiding and abetting charge is five years) and all the counts have a maximum potential fine of $250,000.

Executive and managers are clearly on notice that ICE is serious about enforcing immigration laws and not just against the individual unauthorized workers. Companies need to comply with I-9 regulations and if there is any thought that maybe a company has been a little lax with the I-9 forms, the company should get a good immigration attorney to come in and do a private I-9 audit and to train your HR people on I-9 requirements.

ICE is not fooling around.

February 27, 2008

I-9 Compliance Seminar - Wilmington University

I was very pleased to have been invited to present an I-9 Compliance Seminar in Dover, Delaware before Human Resources representatives of Wilmington University on February 25, 2008.

The seminar went very well and, as always, I learned a few things too. It was interesting fielding questions and getting comments from HR professionals with their university perspective, facing certain I-9 issues that many employers don't face.

February 24, 2008

H1B Specialty Occupation – A Strange AAO Decision

The Administrative Appeals Office has entered a ruling in an H1B appeal dealing with the definition of “specialty occupation” that seems a little odd to me. The case illustrates how important it is to carefully describe the job duties in H1B I-129 applications.

The beneficiary of the H1B petition at issue is to be employed as a “dental research assistant”. When the Service Center denied the petition on the grounds that “dental research assistant” is not a specialty occupation, the employer appealed the denial to the AAO.

The AAO noted that the many duties of the dental research assistant position as described by the employer included “assist dentist with diagnosis” of teeth and tissue problems and therefore the offered position “requires the beneficiary to perform duties normally performed by licensed dentists”. The AAO determined that the Service Center was wrong to have decided that the offered position was not a specialty occupation. So far so good for the beneficiary.

But the AAO then went on to hold that if the beneficiary was going to be performing the duties normally performed by a dentist, then the beneficiary had to satisfy the governmental licensing requirements for dentists. In California, where the Beneficiary is proposed to work, the law requires a license to practice dentistry so the AAO remanded the matter back to the Service Center to determine whether the Beneficiary has a license to practice dentistry.

Huh?

The AAO seems to have decided that someone who is being hired to assist a dentist with a dental diagnosis is, under California law, actually making the diagnosis and actually practicing dentistry and therefore needs a dental license.

If the Beneficiary had a license to practice dentistry presumably he or she would be hired by the employer as a dentist, not as a “dental research assistant”. Even if this particular Beneficiary does have a license to practice dentistry under California law but for some reason is only to be hired as a dental research assistant, presumably he or she still would have submitted evidence of that license to the Service Center. So we can safely assume that the Beneficiary does not, in fact, have such a license and will not, on remand to the Service Center, be able to satisfy his or her burden of proof.

The lesson in this case is that care always needs to be taken when filing an H1B petition in describing the duties of a specialty occupation so that the job is not a job that the Beneficiary clearly isn’t qualified for. It looks to me that such care was taken in this case—the listed job duties seem to plainly state that the dental research assistant will be assisting the dentist in the dentist’s diagnosis and not actually making the diagnosis themselves.

The remand looks like a hollow victory for the employer and the Beneficiary.

February 18, 2008

H-1B Visa Holders in the Indian Communities of Silicon Valley and a Problematic Trend

The February 18, 2008 edition of the San Jose Mercury News has an interesting article suggesting that at least in California Bay Area, the fastest growing group of illegal immigrants is, surprisingly, Indians. The article cites the USCIS statistic that there are 270,000 unauthorized Indian natives in the United States - a 125 percent jump since 2000 which is the largest percentage increase of any nation with more than 100,000 illegal immigrants in the United States.

Still, it’s a small number compared to the number of illegal residents from other countries but it’s the trend that is disturbing. If the trend continues, within three years India would trail only Mexico, El Salvador and Guatemala as a source of illegal immigration.

The problem of course is not illegal entry but legal entry followed by falling out of status. According to the Mercury News article, that typically involves losing H-1b employment especially in today’s economy and even more especially in Silicon Valley.

It’s an unfortunate development and it certainly highlights the importance of H-1b visa holders doing everything they can to remain in status - - for example, always keeping in mind that there is no “grace period” at the termination of an H-1b job and, as much as possible, having a seamless transition from one H-1b employer to another. People should also remember that under certain limited circumstances (depending on the timing of an application for a labor certification or an I-140 Immigrant Petition) H-1b status is available beyond the typical last sixth year.

February 17, 2008

The March, 2008 Department of State Visa Bulletin – Some Improvement for China, India and the Philippines

The State Department has issued the Visa Bulletin for March 2008 and there is some good news for EB3 in the worldwide category, meaning all countries of chargeability other than China, India, Mexico, and the Philippines. Even for these specifically listed countries, there is at least some forward movement in the cutoff dates for EB3 categories.

For China, in the EB2 category there was some forward movement; unfortunately, the EB2 India category continues to be unavailable.

All categories that were previously current are still current.

Here are the specifics:

The EB1 (employment-based first preference) category remains current for all countries of chargeability.

The EB2 (employment-based second preference category) is still current for worldwide, Mexico, and the Philippines and the cutoff date for China moved forward by 11 months, to December 1, 2003. Visa numbers for EB2, India, continue to be unavailable.

The EB3 (employment-based third preference) worldwide category and for the Philippines moved forward significantly to January 1, 2005, an advance of more than two years. China moved forward by more than a year, to December 1, 2002 and India moved forward to August 1, 2001, an improvement of several months. Even Mexico improved, but only by several days to May 1, 2001. The EB3 cutoff date for workers from all countries of chargeability is now January 1, 2002.

Finally, the EB4, EB5, religious workers, and the targeted employment categories are all current.

February 16, 2008

I-485 Adjustment and I-765 Employment Authorization Applications – Now Only One Biometrics Appointment

On February 15, 2008, the USCIS announced that effective immediately it will consolidate biometrics collection when employment-based adjustment of status applications and employment authorization requests are filed at the same time at one of the Service
Centers.

The change means that an applicant who concurrently files Form I-485 (the Application to Register Permanent Status or Adjust Status) based upon the approval of an employment based petition and Form I-765 (the Application for Employment Authorization) the applicant will only have to attend one biometrics appointment letter rather than two.

The change in policy only affects concurrently filed I-485 and I-765 applications and only if the I-485 is based on an approved employment based petition for immigrant status.

This is good news first of all because there will only be one $80.00 biometrics fee rather than two and it will be a lot more convenient for applicants.

Here's the actual USCIS announcement.

February 13, 2008

H-1B I-129 Applications – More Guidance from the USCIS for the H-1B Season

The USCIS Service Center Operations has provided some more guidance for the upcoming H-1B season in recent discussions with a liaison committee of AILA which then published a summary of that guidance. Here are the highlights.

First, stating the obvious, the USCIS fully expects the same volume of H-1B I-129 filings as last year. Because of that high volume, the USCIS is cautioning that a request for Premium Processing (by which the USCIS promises to adjudicate an application within 15 days) may not be able to be honored. Premium processing will be available to request (via Form I-907) but the 15 day guarantee may not be met simply because of the volume. Personally, I think it is still definitely advisable to request premium processing.

On the issue of filing duplicate H-1B applications in an effort to increase the chances of getting it in under the numerical cap, the USCIS advises that it is currently working on a regulation to prohibit this although there may be a question about how “duplicate” is defined. For example, AILA believes that an H-1B petition filed under both the regular and the Master’s cap is NOT considered a duplicate. We know for sure when the reg is published.

Finally, SCOPS confirms that an H-1B application can not be E-filed.

I’ll keep posting on any H-1B news throughout the H-1B season.

February 10, 2008

H1-B I-129 Series Continued - USCIS Hints for Filing this Season

The USCIS has posted three articles on its website that give some very practical advise about the procedures in filing H1-B I-129 petitions to help filers make sure their applications are filed correctly the first time. With the expected crunch of filings all on April 1, 2008, a single mistake in following the procedures could cause the petition to be rejected and sent back by the USCIS (days or weeks later) and by then the annual H1-B cap will have been reached. In fact, there is every indication that the cap will be reached, like last year, on the first day for filing—April 1st. No one is going to get a second chance to get it right.

The first posting is here and rather than restate it all, here are some highlights. 1) Clearly label the I-129 petition in red ink on the top margin as either a regular cap case or a C/S (Chile/Singapore) cap case or a U.S. Masters cap case or an exempt case. 2) Make sure you include the right fee and send in each appropriate filing fee with a separate check—that will minimize the possibility of a simple math error resulting in a single check having the wrong total. 3) Sign in blue ink—it makes it less likely a signature will look like a photocopy rather than the required original. 4) Send in only one petition per envelope, although the USCIS says you can send in multiple envelopes within the same mailing. Personally, I much prefer sending in one petition per Fed Ex envelope. In that way, I have proof of mailing and delivery for every single H1-B petition I file.

The second posting is found here. It covers what the USCIS says are most common mistakes people make when filing H1-B petitions. Incorrect fees, inconsistent and incorrect answers on the I-129 and the H supplements. Be careful, take the time to fill out the applications correctly and then check and check again.

The third posting is found here. It provides helpful ideas on organizing the H1-B applications. First, staple the appropriate check to the appropriate petition; for example the $320.00 check (and the other applicable fees) to the I-129 and the $1,000.00 check to the I-907 premium processing application. The USCIS preferred order is: I-907, then G-28, then I-129 with the H Supplements and then a table of contents with a copy of the applicant’s I-94, the SEVIS Form I-20 or the SEVIS Form 2019 (if applicable), the Certified Labor Condition Form ETA 9035, the employer’s letter of support and a copy of the applicant’s passport. If the applicant will be asking for visa issuance abroad, then the USCIS would like a second copy of everything.

All three postings are worth taking a look at.

Also, here are the links to my own three recent H1-B postings, one dealing with H1-B basics and the other discussing the upcoming H1-B season and the other discussing the new filing address for H1-B cap-exempt filings.

February 6, 2008

I-765 EAD Further Update from USCIS and Clarification

Just a quick update on the USCIS update on the timing of I-765 applications for the renewal of employment authorization – EAD. Two days ago, the USCIS updated its website to advise that I-765 renewal applications would be denied if they were filed earlier than 120 days prior to the expiration of the applicant’s existing EAD end date.

To clarify, this 120 day rule does not apply to I-765 applications that are filed to replace an EAD that is lost, stolen, or mutilated, or that contains incorrect information. An I-765 filed for that purpose may be filed at any time.

February 5, 2008

I-765 EAD Work Authorization – USCIS Updates its Filing Instructions for Renewals

The USCIS has updated its website filing instructions for the I-765 Application for Employment Authorization. It now states that to extend an EAD, the I-765 may not be filed earlier than 120 days prior to the expiration of the original EAD.

Any I-765 application for a renewal EAD that is received on or after January 29, 2008 and that is being filed more than 120 days from the date of expiration of the current EAD will be denied by the USCIS as filed too early.

Please note that since the posting of this entry, the USCIS has issued a revised edition of Form I-765. The new edition date is 4/8/2008. It can be found at the same link above.

February 1, 2008

H1-B Exempt Petitions - A New Filing Location is Announced by the USCIS

On January 30, 2008, the USCIS announced that a special unit has been formed that will be solely responsible for processing certain type H1-B petitions. Effective immediately, H1-B petitions being filed by certain types of educational, nonprofit or governmental organizations (basically the organizations that are normally referred to as “cap exempt” employers, not subject to the H-1B annual numerical limitations) will be process by a unit at the USCIS California Service Center (CSC).

This change applies to H-1B “cap exempt” petitions which include petitions filed by:

• Institutions of higher education, as defined in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 1001(a);

• Nonprofit organizations or entities related to or affiliated with institutions of higher education; and

• Nonprofit research organizations or governmental research organizations, as defined in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(19)(iii)(C).

Such petitions should be mailed by direct mail to:

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
California Service Center
ATTN: CAP EXEMPT H-1B Processing Unit
P.O. BOX 30040
Laguna Niguel, CA 92607-3004
www.uscis.gov

For private courier, such as Federal Express (and I recommend always sending anything to any USCIS office by private courier and never by regular mail) then the petition must be sent to:

U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
California Service Center
ATTN: CAP EXEMPT H-1B Processing Unit
24000 Avila Road, Room 2312
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677

For now, if the petition is sent to the wrong USCIS Service Center, then the USCIS will forward it to the new unit itself. However, in the near future, the USCIS will be announcing special filing instructions for filing these cap exempt H-1B petitions.

The change does NOT apply to other “cap exempt” H1-B petitions such as those requesting an exemption from the cap because the employee holds a U.S. Master’s degree or higher or requesting an extension of stay, or change of employer, or petitions requesting an amendment. These types of petitions, while also “exempt” should continue to be filed at the same USCIS Service Centers as before which depends on where the worker is employed.

January 25, 2008

H1-B Visa - the Basics

Here is another in a series of postings I intend to do on H1-B visa because H1-B season is soon upon us. As I mentioned in an earlier posting, the H1-B filing date this year will be April 1, 2008 and it's not too soon to get started on getting applications ready for filing on that date.

Let's start with H1-B basics and I will follow up with subsequent postings about many other H1-B issues.

What is an H1B visa?

An H-1B visa is a nonimmigrant classification used by a foreign worker to obtain temporary employment in the U.S. in a specialty occupation. It is a very common method by which U.S. employers bring in professional level foreign employees.

What is a specialty occupation?

A specialty occupation requires theoretical and practical application of a body of specialized knowledge along with at least a bachelor’s degree or its equivalent. Examples include engineering, mathematics, physical sciences, medical and health jobs, business specialties, accounting, law, theology and architecture among many others.

What is the H1-B annual "cap"?

There is an annual fiscal year limit of 65,000 aliens who may be issued an H1-B visa. There are an additional 20,000 H-1B visas that are available to graduates of U.S. masters degree (or higher) programs.

Are all H1-B visas subject to the cap?

Continue reading "H1-B Visa - the Basics" »

January 25, 2008

Visa Bulletin - February 2008

Here is the February 2008 Visa Bulletin as published by the United States State Department.

January 19, 2008

H1-B Visas – It’s Not Too Early to Start Planning for April 1, 2008!

It’s not too early to start preparing for April 1, 2008, which is the first day the USCIS will begin accepting H1-B visa applications for the 2009 fiscal year. If last year is any indication, April 1 may also be the last day for filing too! It seems virtually certain that the H1-B cap for the 2009 fiscal year will be reached, just like last year, on the very first day for filing.

The H1-B visa program is the very popular way that U.S. employers are able to hire highly educated foreign professional workers for "specialty occupations" - jobs that require at least a bachelor's degree or the equivalent in the field of specialty. H1-B visas are limited to 65,000 per fiscal year (which are actually reduced by a specific allocation of 6,800 H1-B visas that are set aside each fiscal year for nationals of Singapore and Chile). There is also an additional 20,000 H1-B visas that are available to those with Masters Degrees or higher, earned from a U.S. university.

Employers need to start planning now, as do graduating foreign students who are in the United States in F visa status who hope to qualify for an H1-B visa.

Given the last minute crush of applications last year, one of the very practical problems I experienced as an immigration attorney was obtaining the required degree equivalency report where the beneficiary of the H1-B application obtained their degree from a foreign college or university. Last year, the several services that provide such equivalency reports were so inundated with requests in the week or so leading up to the first day for filing that many of them could not guarantee that their report would be ready in time for filing day. We all need to keep this in mind this year and get those reports done as much in advance as we can.

One of the other issues was getting the appropriate letter from a college or school where the student had completed all the academic requirements for, say, their Masters but were not going to get their actual Masters degree diploma until later in May or June.

Over the next few weeks, I intend to post articles on this blawg on various aspects of the H1-B program—set out the basics of the visa itself, outline the application process, discuss what H1-B applications are not subject to the annual cap, describe alternatives to an H1-B visa when someone is shut out once the cap is reached, etc. In a few days, I start with a posting on the basics of an H1-B visa.

January 19, 2008

An H1-B Visa Solution that Americans (and Our Economy) Should Not Want to Hear

Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates has testified before Congress on many occasions, criticizing the 65,000 cap on the number of H1-B visas that are issued annually to highly skilled foreign workers so they can come to the U.S. to work. Congress continues to refuse to raise the cap despite similar pleas from other high-tech employers and so Microsoft has come up with a solution – A Canadian solution.

As reported in this week’s edition of Business Week, Microsoft had opened a plant in Richmond, British Columbia, just 130 miles away from its Redmond, Washington headquarters. The Richmond office is staffed with 126 Microsoft engineers from 26 different companies, many who could not obtain H1-B visas to work in the U.S. because of the cap.

From British Columbia, the workers can collaborate with their fellow Microsoft workers in the U.S. (in the same time zone of course) and, whenever necessary, drive over the Peace Arch border to meet face-to-face.

Canada makes it very easy by not imposing any limits of visas for skilled workers.

This is hardly a solution that makes sense for the U.S. and its struggling economy but no one can blame Microsoft for doing what it needs to do. The better and longer term solution would be for Congress to eliminate the H1-B cap altogether.

January 18, 2008

Unauthorized Workers in Arizona - A Delay in Enforcement

An agreement has been reached in the federal lawsuit that challenges the new Legal Arizona Workers Act—prosecutions under the new law, which actually took effect on January 1, 2008 will not start until March 1, 2008. This will give Federal Judge Neil V. Wake more time to consider the legal challenges that have been raised by a very varied group of plaintiffs. The Judge has promised to rule no later than early February.

In the meantime, some Arizona legislators have introduced bills that would amend some of the more controversial provisions of the law—for example, whether the law will apply to all current employees or only those hired after January 1 of this year. According to the Arizona Republic, two Republicans state legislators who voted for the bill now say they regret their vote.

The law allows Arizona courts to suspend or revoke the business license of any Arizona business that intentionally or knowingly employ illegal immigrants. It also requires Arizona employers to use the E-Verify system to check the legal status of all new hires. E-Verify is a free, voluntary, online federal program that enables employers to check names and identification documents of new hires to confirm their employment eligibility. However, the online system, by the federal government’s own admission, is fraught with problems.

I’ll post updates as the litigation continues.

January 16, 2008

SHRM Presentation on I-9 Compliance and No-Match Letter Updated

On January 15, 2008, I was privileged to give a presentation to the Delaware Chapter for the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) on recent developments in I-9 compliance and the proposed Department of Homeland Security No-Match letter regulation. The presentation was given before the Delaware SHRM Chapter at the Cavalier Country Club in Newark, Delaware.

I discussed recent changes in the I-9 form itself and changes in the List A documents that are now accepted as proof of identity and work authorization and I provided an update on the DHS proposed regulation regarding No-Match letters now being litigated in Federal Court in California.


January 4, 2008

Visa Premium Processing for R-1 Religious Worker Visa Applications Suspended Again

On January 4, 2008, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that its suspension of premium processing services for religious worker (R-1) visa petitions will be extended again--until July 8, 2008.

With “premium processing” the USCIS provides much faster processing of certain employment-based petitions and it guarantees that it will make a decision on those petitions within a 15-calendar day processing time. In these matters, that means that once the R-1 application is received, the USCIS, if premium processing is requested and paid for, will decide the case within 15 calendar days.

The USCIS blames the “complexities” involved in these nonimmigrant religious worker petitions for its inability to ensure premium processing service within 15 calendar days.

December 26, 2007

New I-9 Form - Required as of Today December 26

Just a reminder that as of today, December 26, 2007, the new I-9 form must be used by employers. As I noted in my posting of November 26, 2007, up until today, use of the new I-9 form was encouraged but not required. Now, it's required.

The new I-9 form removes five documents for List A—that is, the list of documents that simultaneously prove both identity and employment eligibility. They include: Certificate of U.S. Citizenship (Form N-560 or N-570); Certificate of Naturalization (Form N-550 or N-570); Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-151); the unexpired Reentry Permit (Form I-327); and the unexpired Refugee Travel Document (Form I-571). According to the USCIS, there forms lacked features to help deter counterfeiting and fraud.

Also, one document has been added to List A of the List of Acceptable Documents: the most recent version of the Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766).

December 12, 2007

EB-2 Visa Catagory for Indians Moves Back Two Years in Latest Visa Bulletin

The Visa Bulletin for January 2008 has been released and the EB-2 catagory (employment-based second preference) for nationals of India moved back a full two years to January 1, 2000!

The employment-based second preference refers to members of the professions holding an advanced degree or persons of exceptional ability.

The EB-3 catagory for Indians remained at May 1, 2001.

December 11, 2007

Form I-129 PIMS Confirmation Update

The Department of State has provided AILA (the American Immigration Lawyers Association) with an update regarding the recently implemented Petition Information Management System, otherwise known as PIMS. The Department of State has reported to AILA that while there are some minor growing pains in implementing the new system, PIMS confirmation is not causing delays in the issuing of visas.

Under PIMS, Form I-129 applications, along with the employer support letters and the other supporting documentation that is filed to obtain, for example, an H1-B visa or an L visa, are scanned into a database here in the U.S. Consular posts abroad are then required to access that database when an individual appears at the consulate for their visa interview. Once the documents that the visa applicant presents at the visa interview are checked against the documents in the database, the visa can then be issued--assuming the documents match.

The Department of State is reporting that the system has already resulted in catching some forged or altered I-797 forms (the USCIS approval notice that is issued when the USCIS approves the I-129 petition).

Otherwise, according to the DOS, there have not been significant delays in consular posts being able to access the scanned documents and PIMS confirmation has not caused delays in applicants having their visas issued.

December 5, 2007

DHS Files Appeal of No-Match Injunction Order

On December 5, 2007 Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff released a statement confirming that DHS has filed an appeal of U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer’s Order granting an injunction against the Department’s enforcement of its proposed regulation on Social Security No-Match letters. DHS, according to the statement, is not “abandoning” the regulation.

Here is my earlier post on Judge’ Breyer’s Order.

This move seems to be inconsistent with an earlier DHS request that the Court put the matter on hold while it re-worked the regulation to try to fix the provisions that Judge Breyer found objectionable. Here's my earlier post on that DHS request.

Not surprising, the DHS seems to be pushing hard to get this regulation in place in some form and it appears inevitable that private employers will, in fact, eventually be put in the position of having to deal with it.

The reg would set up procedures for employers to follow when they receive a no-match letters from the Social Security Administration advising the employer that an employee’s name does not match the social security number that the SSA has on file. Basically the employer would have to correct the discrepancy within 90 days or fire the employee. An employer who followed the procedure would have a “safe-harbor” against any allegation that it was knowingly employing an illegal worker; an employer who ignored the procedures would be presumed to be on notice that it was employing an illegal worker.

December 4, 2007

H-1B, H-2 and H-3 Visa Cap Count Announced by USCIS as of December 4, 2007

As of December 4, 2007, the USCIS released the latest numbers on the various caps associated with H-1B visas, H-2B visas and H-3 visas.

It was no news to most that the H-1B cap of 65,000 was reached on April 2, 2007 (also the very first day such petitions could be filed) and that the cap of an additional 20,000 H-1B visas for foreign workers with a Master’s or higher level degree from a U.S. academic institution was reached on April 30, 2007. Other than those eligible for H-1B visas because they will work for cap-exempt U.S. employers, cap-subject prospective H-1B employees will have to wait until the next fiscal year.

H-1B visas are available to certain highly skilled temporary workers who have a bachelor’s degree or higher (or its equivalent) in a specific specialty such as architects, engineers, computer programmers, accountants, doctors and college professors.

On the H-2 visas (for workers in industries with peak load, seasonal or other U.S. employers with intermittent employment needs) the annual cap is divided the annual numerical limitations of 66,000 into two halves. The first half annual cap of 33,000 such visas was reached on September 27, 2007. For the second half, 7,164 of the remaining 33,000 H-2 visas have been approved or are pending as of December 4, 2007.

Finally, on the general H-3 visas (visas for aliens who are coming temporarily to the U.S. to receive training provided by a business entity, academic, or vocational institute (other than graduate medical education or training) there is no annual cap. However, for the particular H-3 visa for “Special Exchange Visitors” (those who are participating in a special education training program for children with physical, mental, or emotional disabilities), there is an annual cap of only 50 visas and the USCIS announced that as of November 29, 2007, one such H-3 visa has been approved.

I intend to post a specific article on H-3 visas in the next day or two.


November 29, 2007

I-9 Forms - They Are Free! Don't Pay for Them!

I just received an unsolicited email from a Pennsylvania-based company offering to sell me a packet of 50 of the new version I-9 forms for $27.95!

That's not exactly a bargain considering that I and anyone else can download the forms for free from the USCIS website.

So just as a reminder--don't pay for I-9 forms or any other immigration forms all of which can be printed for free right from the USCIS website! In case you want to print one out right now, here is the new version of the English language I-9 form and the Spanish language I-9 form.

November 26, 2007

New I-9 Form Must be Used as of December 26, 2007

The USCIS will announce in a Federal Register notice today, November 26, 2007, that employers must begin using the new I-9 form no later than December 26, 2007. As I discussed in an earlier posting, the USCIS previously announced that a revised version of Form I-9, one which now includes the revision date of 06/05/07 printed on the lower right corner of the form, would be required to be used soon.

Now that the notice has been published in the Federal Register as of November 26, 2007, all employers must begin using the revised form on December 26, 2007.

Here’s the new I-9 form.

November 24, 2007

No-Match Letters: the Adminstration Will Try Again

On November 23, 2007, the Bush administration announced that it will suspend its legal defense of the Social Security no-match letter regulation it sought to impose earlier this fall.

The Administration is going to redraft the regulation to try to meet the legal problems that led United States District Court Judge Charles Breyer to enjoin it from enforcing the reg back in September. I discussed Judge Breyer's ruling in a prior posting here.

It is clear that the Adminstration is not giving up and will simply try again to impose immigration law enforcement duties on private employers.

The Administration will probably wait until the Spring of 2008 to announce changes in the proposed reg which is hopes will then pass judicial muster.

November 21, 2007

H1-b Visa Concurrent Employment - a Quick About Face by the California Service Center

No sooner had the California Service Center announced that it would begin denying Form I-129 applications for H1-b concurrent employment where the applicant currently works in H1-b status for a cap-exempt employer and is seeking concurrent H1-b employment with a cap-subject employer, that it then announced a change of mind--but only pending clarification from the USCIS.

Typically, an H1-b visa holder working for a cap-exempt employer can apply for concurrent H1-b employment with a cap-subject employer without worrying about the H1-b cap. The California Service Center, however, had recently announced that it was going to begin denying such applications.

Fortunately,in a change of heart, the California Service Center has decided to wait for guidance from the USCIS before implementing this change of policy.

November 20, 2007

L-2 Visa Work Authorization - the Basics

In follow up to my November 9, 2007 posting about work authorization for spouses and children of those in various nonimmigrant status, here’s the law on those who are here in L-2 status (i.e., the spouse and children of an L-1 nonimmigrant).

Keep in mind first that L-1A nonimmigrant status is given to those who have worked abroad for one continuous year within the preceding three years and how are being transferred temporarily to the United States to work in an executive, managerial (L-1A) or specialized knowledge (L-1B) capacity for he same or a qualifying, related business. The spouse and minor children of such visa holders enter the U.S. On L-2 visas.

An L-2 spouse is entitled to request work authorization. The law is found at INA Section 214(c)(2)(E) which states:

In the case of an alien spouse admitted under section 101(a)(15)(L) , who is accompanying or following to join a principal alien admitted under such section, the Attorney General shall authorize the alien spouse to engage in employment in the United States and provide the spouse with an `employment authorized' endorsement or other appropriate work permit.

Note that the statute specifically refers to “spouse” without any mention of “children” and therefore, the L-2 children of the L-1 visa holder is not permitted to obtain work authorization.

In order to obtain work authorization, the L-2 spouse, after entering the United States files Form I-765. Along with the application, the spouse must provide proof of the marriage, evidence of the current status of their L-1 husband or wife, and evidence of his or her own entry in L-2 status and two passport style photographs. The instructions to Form I-765 (since the initial posting of this entry, the most recent edition of the I-765 is the 4/8/2008 edition) should be carefully followed in completing the application, in providing all the necessary supporting documentation and on knowing exactly where to send the application for filing.

As of the posting of this article the filing fee for the I-765 is $340.00.

Typically, work authorization is granted for up to two years and it can then be extended but it won’t be granted for any period longer than the validity period for the underlying L-1 petition.

November 17, 2007

E-3D Visa Work Authorization - the Basics

Here is another posting in my series of work authorization eligibility for the spouse and minor children of principal visa holders: this posting concerns those who are here on E-3D visas—the spouse and minor children of E-3 Specialty Occupation Workers from Australia.

First, the E-3 visa is available to a national of the Commonwealth of Australia who is coming to the U.S. to perform services in a specialty occupation with “specialty occupation” being defined in the same manner as in the H-1B context. That is, an occupation that requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and attainment of a bachelor’s or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation. The Australian national must be able to show he or she will be employed in a specialty occupation in the United States and that he or she possesses the required U.S. bachelor’s or higher degree (or its equivalent) in the specific specialty to meet the minimum requirement for entry into the occupation in the U.S.

The dependent spouse and children (under the age of 21) of an E-3 principal are admitted in E-3D classification.

Under Section 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the dependent spouse, but not the child, of an E-3 nonimmigrant may apply for work authorization. As with the spouse of an L visa holder, the law specifically mentions “spouse” and notably does not mention “child” in describing the E-3 holder’s dependents who are eligible.

The E-3D spouse files Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization along with evidence of the marriage relationship and with evidence of his or her spouse’s E-3 principal status.

Please note that since the posting of this entry, the USCIS has issued a revised edition of the I-765. The new edition date is 4/4/2008. The new I-765 can be found at the same link as above.


November 15, 2007

Visa Bulletin for December 2007

The United States Department of State has posted the December 2007 Visa Bulletin on its website. In Section D, the DOS describes the retrogression of both the China-mainland and the India Employment Second preference cut-off dates. In Section E, the DOS provides projections for immigrant visa availability for both family preferences and employment preferences.


November 10, 2007

H-1b Visa Holder Dependents - H4 and Work Authorization - the Basics

In my ongoing series of postings regarding the rights of spouses and children of principal visa holders to obtain work authorization, quite simply, an H-4 visa holder (i.e., the spouse or minor child of an H-1b visa holder) - may not accept employment. The H-4 visa holder must obtain their own work visa.

However, H-4 visa holders may engage in full or part time study.

November 9, 2007

J-2, L-2, H-4 and F-2 Visa Derivitive Spouses and Dependants - Can They Get Work Authorization?

I was recently asked by a client who is here in the United States on a J-1 visa and his wife who has a derivative J-2 visa to help them in obtaining work authorization for her. When we were successful in doing that I decided to write up a summary of the various rules and regulations regarding work authorization for the spouses of those who are here in the United States on some other principal working visa—that is, the spouse who is here on an L-2 visa because their husband or wife is working here as an L-1A executive or managerial transferee or as a specialized knowledge transferee on an L-1B visa or, as above, the spouse who is here on a J-2 visa because their husband or wife is here on a J-1 visa.

I’ll discuss the situations when a derivative spouse can’t obtain work authorization; for example, the spouse who is here on an H-4 visa because their husband or wife is in the U.S. working on a specialized worker H-1B visa or the spouse who is here on an F-2 visa because their spouse is here as an F-1 student.

Before getting to those summaries, let me state the obvious: never, ever work in the U.S. without first obtaining proper work authorization. Doing so violates the law, violates the terms and conditions of your status, subjects you to all sorts of dire penalties such as criminal penalties, civil penalties, being placed in removal proceedings, having your visa revoked, being prevented from returning to the U.S. under certain circumstances and for certain long periods of time, etc. Just don’t do it!

With that proviso being stated, let’s start with the J-2 spouse whose husband or wife is in the United States on a J-1 visa. First, the J-2 spouse has status to seek work authorization but he or she will get it only under certain circumstances. Title 8, Code of Federal Regulations, part 214.2(j)(1)(v) states: “Income from the spouse's or dependent's employment may be used to support the family's customary recreational and cultural activities and related travel, among other things. Employment will not be authorized if this income is needed to support the J-1 principal alien.”

Clearly, the J-2 spouse can obtain work authorization but he or she will do so only after satisfying the USCIS that employment is only being sought and the income will only be used only to support the family’s recreational and cultural activities. If the J-2 spouse needs to work in order to pay for the family’s basic living expenses, then work authorization is not going to be given.

The J-2 spouse applies for the Employment Authorization Document (the “EAD”), by filing Form I-765 with the USCIS Service Center that has jurisdiction over his or her place of residence. For example, if the J-2 visa holder resides in Philadelphia, he or she would apply at the Vermont Service Center. The I-765 should be submitted with all required evidence including evidence of not only the applicant’s J-2 status but also their spouse’s J-1 status, the DS- 2019 forms, copies of the identification page of J-2's passport, including the photo page, a copy (both front and back) of his or her I-94 and the I-94 of the J-1 spouse, 2 passport style photographs, a copy of any prior work-authorization card, a letter stating why the income is necessary and finally, of course, the filing fee. As of the writing of this post, the filing fee for the I-765 is $340.00.

If approved, the J-2 visa holder will be authorized to work in any kind of full or part-time employment for the period stated on the card but only as long as the J-1 spouse is maintaining their own status.

On the next posting, I’ll talk about L-2 spouses of those on L-1 executive or managerial intracompany transferee visas.

November 8, 2007

New I-9 Form for Employment Verification Announced by USCIS

On November 7, 2007, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that a revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form (I-9) is now available for use.

Every employer in the United States is required to complete a Form I-9 for every single employee hired in order to satisfying the employer’s legal obligation to verify the employee's identity and authorization to work. In order to complete the form, the employee must provide the employer with certain documents from a List of Acceptable Documents that establish both identity and work authorization.

Back in 1996, The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) mandated a reduction in the number of documents that employers may accept from newly hired employees during the employment eligibility verification process and in 1997 regulations were issued that eliminated some of the documents that IIRIRA removed as being acceptable . However, Form I-9 was never updated to reflect the revised List of Acceptable Documents.

Now it has been.

The revised form removes five documents for List A—that is, the list of documents that simultaneously prove both identity and employment eligibility. They include: Certificate of U.S. Citizenship (Form N-560 or N-570); Certificate of Naturalization (Form N-550 or N-570); Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-151); the unexpired Reentry Permit (Form I-327); and the unexpired Refugee Travel Document (Form I-571). According to the USCIS, there forms lacked features to help deter counterfeiting and fraud.

Also, one document has been added to List A of the List of Acceptable Documents: the most recent version of the Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766).

The new M-274 Handbook for employers, the USCIS instructions for how to complete the new I-9 form, is also now available.

Continue reading "New I-9 Form for Employment Verification Announced by USCIS" »

November 4, 2007

H1-B Visa Fee Increase Stricken From Bill

Fortunately, House and Senate conferees struck a proposed H1-B visa fee increase from a conference report that is scheduled to be made public on November 5. House and Senate appropriators took this welcome action when they met to combine the Defense, Military Construction-VA, and Labor-HHS-Education appropriations into one single bill.

The fee increase had been proposed by Senator Charles Grassley and would have increased H1-B application fees by an additional $3,500.00 on top of the already too-high fees charged to U.S. employers who file the I-129 H1-B application.


November 1, 2007

H-1 Visa and L-1 Visa Holders and Their Travel Abroad: No More Need to Present I-485 Receipt Notices at a Port of Entry

In a welcome change, on November 1, 2007, the USCIS published a Final Rule that makes it easier for certain H-1 and L-1 nonimmigrants who are returning from travel abroad to re-enter the United States without having to worry about having abandoned an I-485 Adjustment of Status application that they might have pending. The Final Rule is effective immediately.

Prior to this new rule being made effective, an individual on a an H-1 or an L-1 visa who traveled outside the United States while they had an adjustment of status application pending with the USCIS was required to show, when they re-entered the United States, the USCIS receipt notice for that I-485. Previously, if the H or L visa holder failed to show the Receipt Notice, they ran the risk of having their I-485 to be “deemed” to have been abandoned.

The USCIS has now quite correctly recognized that producing the Receipt Notice is “an unnecessary documentation requirement from the regulations that the Department of Homeland Security has determined causes an undue burden” on the H-1 and L-1 nonimmigrants.

Here’s the background.

Continue reading "H-1 Visa and L-1 Visa Holders and Their Travel Abroad: No More Need to Present I-485 Receipt Notices at a Port of Entry" »

October 24, 2007

H1-B Visas – A New Push to Increase the Cap?

By letter dated October 23, 2007, 16 Democratic members of Congress wrote to House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi asking that Congress take immediate steps to “resolve the immediate talent crisis that is facing U.S. employers", specifically by raising the annual cap on H1-B highly skilled worker visas. As noted in other postings here, in addition to not passing comprehensive immigration reform this past summer, it appears that Congress will not be passing standalone immigration reform either. The Senate’s failure last week to pass the DREAM Act is evidence of that.

Nonetheless, at least some members of Congress appear to understand the need to increase the H1-B visa cap from the current annual cap of 65,000 (and 20,000 more for foreign students who receive advanced degrees from U.S. schools) to something much higher. Proposals include having no cap at all to the vague idea that the number be tied to the then current “needs of U.S. employers”.

Whatever the cap should be, it is clear that it needs to be higher than the current cap which was reached this year on April 1st--the very first day for filing H1-B applications. So many H1-B visa applications were received that day that a lottery system had to be implemented, a pretty ridiculous way to try to help U.S. employers stay competitive in a gobal economy.

Despite efforts such as this letter to Speaker Pelosi, it appears unlikely that Congress will be addressing this issue anytime soon. Nonetheless, the 16 members of Congress who signed onto the letter deserve credit: Ellen Tauscher (Calif.), Adam Smith (Wash.), Joseph Crowley (N.Y.), Artur Davis (Ala.), Ron Kind (Wis.), Rick Larsen (Wash.), Dennis Moore (Kan.), Adam Schiff (Calif.), Jim Moran (Va.), Gregory Meeks (N.Y.), Susan Davis (Calif.), Lois Capps (Calif.), Gabrielle Giffords (Ariz.), Christopher Carney (Pa.), Michael Arcuri (N.Y.), and David Wu (Ore.).

October 19, 2007

H1B Visa Extensions – Don’t Forget About Extending Your Spouse’s and Children’s H-4 Visas Too!

H1b visa holders (and their employers and their attorneys) need to be very careful when it comes to time to extend their H1b visas to remember to also extend the derivative H4 visas for a spouse and minor children. As most H1b visa holders understand, H1b visas can be granted for up to 6 years, typically in two 3 year increments. (Under certain, very specific circumstances, an H1b visa can be extended beyond 6 years). When an H1b visa is approved, the spouse and the minor children of an H1b visa holder are given H4 visas.

Prior to the end of the first three year period, the employer of the H1b visa holder can file to extend the employee’s H1b stay for an additional 3 years. Unfortunately, either through oversight or ignorance, separate, simultaneous extension applications are sometimes not made for the H4 spouse and H4 minor children. When this happens, the H1b visa is extended and the H1b visa holder remains in status while his or her H4 spouse and H4 children fall out of status, obviously with very unfortunate results.

H4 visas are NOT just automatically extended when H1b visas are extended! Each H4 visa holder must file their own I-539 application to extend. When the H1b visa is extended, obtaining an H4 visa extension should be simple—as long as everyone remembers to apply!

What if the H4 visa holder, for whatever reason, fails to file for an extension?

Continue reading "H1B Visa Extensions – Don’t Forget About Extending Your Spouse’s and Children’s H-4 Visas Too!" »

October 14, 2007

DHS No-Match Letter Regulation Temporarily Blocked--But Probably Not For Long

On October 10, 2007, Judge Charles R. Breyer of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction that, for now, will continue to prevent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from proceeding with its new "no-match" regulation. Following Congress’ sorry failure to pass comprehensive immigration reform this past summer, the Bush Administration enacted the new no-match regulation in an effort to shift much of the burden of enforcing existing immigration laws against the hiring of illegal aliens from the government to private employers.

While I understand the Bush Administration’s desire to get at enforcement one way or the other, this new reg is not the answer. The problem is that the Court’s ruling is really only a temporary stay and it just delays the inevitable day when private employers are forced to become enforcers of federal immigration law—something that should be the government’s job. The comprehensive immigration problems we have in the United States require comprehensive immigration reform in particular giving illegal aliens a path to residency and eventual citizenship.

Basically, no-match letters are often generated when an employer sends a W-2 form to the government reporting the name, social security number and earnings of an employee to the government, but the name and/or the social security number don’t match the government’s records. About 8 to 11 million no-match letters go out to U.S. employers every year.

Obviously, any number of these no-match letters involve aliens who are in the U.S. illegally and who are working without proper authorization. Under current law, a U.S. employer must verify, through the use of the I-9 form, that a prospective employee really is who they say they are and that they are legally allowed to work. The employee has to present certain documents as part of the I-9 process. Some documents establish both identity and work authorization (such as a U.S. passport or a green card) and other documents separately establish identity (such as a driver’s license) and work authorization (such as a social security card). When the prospective employee presents the documents, the employer must accept them as valid if they reasonably appear to be genuine. Of course, the employer must act in good-faith in accepting the documents; if the employer has actual knowledge that the employee does not really have work authorization, it’s not a defense that the documents “appeared” to be genuine.

This is where the new reg comes in. The new reg provides for certain “safe-harbor” investigative provisions that an employer would follow if it received a no-match letter. The safe harbor provisions essentially involved going through the identity and work authorization process all over again. In this second go-round, however, if the discrepancy could not be resolved, the employer would not have much choice but to fire the employee.

Continue reading "DHS No-Match Letter Regulation Temporarily Blocked--But Probably Not For Long" »